If you were just watching the box score ;- ) you might conclude that he had been something less than Shoeless Joe Jackson. Ichiro is dialed in, big time.
Hope I can eat my analysis. Would do so happily. Am enthused to see Ichiro's OPS climb over .700.
Still of the basic opinion that a player "dialed in" should, in fact, be "overly" productive, (i.e. --- his production numbers while dialed in should significantly exceed his production numbers when not).
In truth, the best argument I've heard that has some traction with me is that the Ms faced an inordinate number of ace pitchers early and Ichiro's "sub-par" production rates (for a guy dialed in) were due to a skewed quality of competition.
The whole Ichiro discussion aside ... the "boxscore" analyst sees Lowe, (extreme GB pitcher) with 6 walks and a 5-GB to 6-FB ratio and concludes ... the Ms were facing a Kevin Millwood redux. Being that Lowe also happened to amble through Georgia once-upon-a-time ... my "see-no-evil" response to this game is:
"I don't think the Ms will be counting on HR prowess of Figgins and Ichiro to carry the offense on a regular basis."
That Lowe "spew chart" is absolutely precious! Well done. Of course, when it's 3 foot WIDER than it is tall ... I'm thinking ... (was that 4 intentional walks ... or 5?)
Final comment: While I'm pleased to see Smoak finally get a day off, it's a pity he had to miss a completely dreadful effort from Lowe.
=== Figgins ===
Is cutting his zone nice and tight, is taking good swings, and .... the reason his production is not too swift? He gets no walks. Chone Figgins with an 0.33 EYE can't succeed, period. No version of Chone Figgins, such as Brett Butler or Luis Polonia, can succeed with an 0.33 EYE.
Of course, the 0.33 EYE goes up when Figgins starts hurting pitchers. He started hurting pitchers tonight. In this chapter of the story, Figgins has to do his damage with doubles, triples, and homers. If there's another chapter, if, then that one will include some BB knights and paladins.
.
=== Hitterish ===
Before the game, Kyle Seager explained that an aggressive hitter takes more pitches. If you don' know what he meant, you better ax somebody. Geoff Baker has a post up on it. It is the Eric Wedge mantra that has drawn so much grief from baseball analysts who have not played baseball.
Dave Valle referred to it on the postgame. Charlie Lau said that guys like Figgins -- says Valle -- look "hitterish." The basic idea:
- The guy is looking for something particular.
- He decisively ignores other pitches.
- If he gets his pitch he will do you great harm.
- He is calm, alert, and "on top of the situation."
You know, like all of the Rangers look. If the ball is in their zone, they'll rip it and you just hope you get lucky. If it isn't, you fall behind in the count. All with an air of inevitability.
Chone Figgins is not Teddy Ballgame. But standing in the box, he looks like the strike zone is his office.
.
=== Youuuuuu'll Never Fiiiiiind ===
Another chart liiiiiiiike Miiiiiiiine ...
..........
6 walks, a full 112 pitches ... and in all the 6-walk theme park, you could only find three pitches above the 42" high mark. That's, what, the sign that gets you onto the Dumbo ride?
Or check even whether there are any pitches above the 36-inch mark. Hey, coach ::sniff:: you told me this'd work. You promised I'd get them out if I did that!
With nobody out in the 4th inning, Lowe had thrown 85 pitches (!?) and his uniform looked like somebody had fished him out of the Puget Sound. Sgt. Wedge's troops, this one's for you. The Indians' rotation is gonna be stark-ravin' glad to get out of here and face some easy hitters. Like Boston's or the Angels'.
.
=== Ackley ===
G-Moneyball has aptly pointed out that Ackley wants it too much. Just so.
There are a lot of synonyms in the English language; English is a magnificent system of idea transfer. The synonym I would choose for Dustin Ackley isn't "shrill;" that has the idea of high vibration, of near-panic. I wouldn't use the synonym "hectic"; that has the idea that he's rushing things, being hasty. He's not; he moves deliberately. I wouldn't say "overexcited" or "high-strung"; that has an emotional component that is alien to him.
I'd say that he has been "greedy." Definition? An overwhelming desire to have more than is sufficient. DING DING DING.
In Wednesday's game, Ackley chose to simply flip the greed switch off. He chose to let the game come to him again, and was Dustin Ackley again. Two line shot singles and the 70 HIT ability.
..........
You know who had a problem with greed, who had to learn how to let the game come to him? Edgar Martinez.
.
=== Saunders ===
We know you're wonderin' what our cornball shtick has to say tonight :- ) so...
The swing is pretty much 2011, maybe a bit less hook around the corner is all. The good news: Wednesday he looked much more relaxed. The right shoulder never covered his ear at any time -- and by a freakish coincidence, Saunders effortless drew two walks.
Wish he'd drop the weight a little and wish he'd go back to arm-swinging. But, remember, his OPS+ was 21 last year. He's better.
.
=== Montero ===
Blowers, on TV, noted that in Tuesday's game, Montero came up in RBI situations and the Indians' pitchers took him down below the zone. And off the plate. And Montero swung, first pitch, 1-1 counts, etc.
If you're protecting the plate with two strikes, says Mikey, that's one thing. But fishing for sucker pitches on 0-0 and 1-1, that's just being overanxious.
I take full credit for re-typing this. In your subconscious you'll remember it as just one more fantastic Dr. D cat scan. Don't think I won't send the bill.
.
=== Ichiro ===
In addition to his homer ... what was it, 410 feet? ... he hit four doubles that didn't show in the box score.
One double was called foul by the 1B ump; it might just have missed going over the bag, or it might not have. Another one sliced hard down the 3B line, landing a baseball or two foul. Another one was caught on the warning track, deeeeeeeep in Safeco's RF power alley, and would have been out of some parks. Another low, hard liner into the power alley happened to hit the CF. His final at-bat was a fairly hard fly ball to the LF.
Meaning that his BABIP was .000 on the night. It should have been .600, besides the homer.
If you were just watching the box score ;- ) you might conclude that he had been something less than Shoeless Joe Jackson. If you'd had the game on, you'd gone away wide-eyed muttering "that guy should be illegal." Ichiro is dialed in, big time.
His batting EYE is 1.00, his line drive rate is crazy, his SwStr% doesn't exist, and his OOZ doesn't either. Like Eric Wedge said: "Ichiro is just hitting into a lot of hard outs." That'll do for us too.
.
Felix tomorry,
Dr D
Comments
... what Saunders swing looks like. As long has he quiets the voices in his head and plays with reaction and talent he will be fine. He just needs to stay mentally tough and not over think things.
Lonnie
How many games would see from a veteran line-up like the Sox or Yankees where the starter pitched that poorly and the team got 6 walks and 7 hits off the starter including a double and two home runs and only scored 4 runs? The team left a runner at third with less than two outs 3 times last night. They didn't hit behind runners except when they got lucky...and Montero personally murdered two huge rallies in their sleep. You can see the talent...but this may be a team that scores 10% less than they should based on their bases gained.
The M's obviously paid a lot of attention to his swing :- ) with the rubber bands and weighted bats and whatnot ...
But! It is true that sometimes that physical training can change your mental swing keys, right Mo-Dog ... a player could use (say) a flexible club and it could get him to thinking in terms of wrists, or whatever, and that thought could stay with him even though the swing isn't visibly different...
It's conceivable that Saunders' attitude and approach alone will do it for him. That would depend on how he did on certain pitches, like soft stuff away.
.............
He's hitting .189, but his EYE is good at 0.50 and Michael Saunders need only hit .240 with 25-30 homers to be a VERY good player. He could afford to be an ISO-only offensive player.
They had a blizzard of LOB's last night, true dat...
He's got the feet that Cammy did...he can steal you 25-30 bags, give you +10 runs in the outfield, draw enough walks to keep the K/BB tolerable despite the 150 Ks and hit you 20 dingers. If he does all of that while batting even .220...he's a better fit for the team than Gutierrez.
Can I just say that I really like Blowers as a color man? He knows the game very well...he has a very fine feel for hitters especially and can seem very prescient sometimes...I just wish his voice were less monotone, that's all.