Add new comment

1

Instead of addressing what he has said, you were hoping that he would admit that he was a Young Earth Creationists so that you could impugn his knowledge and judgment. First, that is fallacious argumentation. A person can be wrong on one subject and right on another. Second, he explained he is NOT a Young Earth Creationist so your tangent is especially irrelevant.
If you really want to discuss the substance of Dr. D's post then focus on what has actually been said instead of trying to suggest that by disagreeing with the theory of AGW a person must be ignorant about the subject. And don't use perjoratives like "denier".

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.