Add new comment

1

I still think the M's should strongly consider player development as a key objective to the '10 season.  I wouldn't invest in either OF or C, since I like our depth in young players at those positions.  I would really like to pick-up a super-utility infielder as a stop loss for Wilson's health and Tui's development. It also won't impede Triunfel if he surprises with his development.
I'm in favor of buying my DH and 1B on the free agent market since that is where there are multiple options and we wouldn't be blocking any big bats.  There were 13 1B with OPS of >0.900 last year and 7 2B, 3B, and SS total with OPS of >0.900.  This is why Nick Johnson (21st best OPS for 1B) or Russell Branyan (16th best) have limited value.
Really, I think Sandy has the best low risk approach to building a team.  Find out which prospects shake out in the wash and only after that process fill the confirmed holes with veterans.  If you do it in reverse you might find you've blocked or traded the wrong prospect.  Of all Bavasi's moves, the trade of Asdrubal Cabrera has had the longest term consequences because we are still trying to come up with a quality back-up plan for Betancourt's regression.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.