Add new comment

I'm *not* in favor of signing Scutaro.  I'd play Tui. 
SSI keeps warning the googly-eyed-mad-in-love ... that this administration is too biased towards defense, and too biased towards "I'll believe it when I see it" on ML-ready blue chippers.
I would absoLUTEly save money on Moore, Saunders, and Tui all 3, if it meant I could accomplish something like Lackey, Dunn, and Harden.
..............
Scutaro at SS, was the earlier conversation, and in that context he could be moving a 30 or even 20 position to 55-60.  That's big.
Scutaro at 3B, for 1-2 years, is is contrary to Stars & Scrubs but moving a 35-40 position to 50-60 (due to glovework) brings clear advantages.  Those are outlined above.
If Scutaro takes over at 3B for a year or two, I'll console myself that a 2009 hole has been upgraded, and that Tui might be a super-sub on the infield.
Would rather have a Dunn or Pena or somesuch.