Add new comment

1

You can definitely find scenarios in which a team actually is playing an RLP, or worse, at CF, SS, C, maybe other positions.
As we both know, whether a team is going to wind up with a hemorrhage like that, or is going to have a better situation, is something that needs to be anticipated in the biz plan.  
Plugging RLP values into a trade-vs-trade "calculation" might be reasonable in some cases, but it can't be done dogmatically or unthinkingly.   As usual, what I object to is the implication that RLP-value is the "correct" basis for proceeding, and that other approaches are unintelligent.
In many cases, such as the one we're talking about here, plugging in RLP would have led to a lousy forecast.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.