1
If you've seen 100 of these kids and are suspicious of Jackson, that is an assessment that counts for something with me.
No offense against others in the cyber-sphere, but it is the implication that "Jackson's statline, read correctly, shows that he isn't very good" that does not weigh with me. Because yours is an assessment that demonstrates respect for the complexity of the problem.
It IS interesting that a good number of fine pitching analysts don't like what they see in Jackson.
:daps: