You're not getting the crux of my post here. I've paused to understand that what you presented in your post was a quote, and understand what James is saying about "infanticide" in what was linked (and not clear here with the short quote about infanticide). I understand because I read that article.
What I'm saying is that as-is, the quote here perpetuates a falsehood that democratic politicians would like women to have the option of killing their newborn-to-one-year old baby. In the U.S. mainstream and outside the U.S., that's how infanticide reads, so that's why I (and others) would react with disgust at the suggestion here that some democrats are only holding back on their "kill 1 year olds" stance because they know that wouldn't win them an election. Make sense?