It's clear my inability to communicate so that you understand what i'm truly saying comes down to this use of the word "infantcide". I understand what you're saying here, but it's clear from your response that you've misunderstood my characterization by your line of response and questions. I'm saying that by the traditional definition of infanticide--fully born birth to one year old (not "partial birth")--would be far far far fringe. I'd hope that people would understand THAT. Using infanticide to mean partial birth abortion (or truly any form of abortion as some on the right have done), is a co-option of the word that only makes a real understanding and debate around partial birth abortion that much harder (as illustrated well here).
Apologies for the Fox news comments. They don't add anything to the conversation. It's simply frustration and recognition of what you said. People like you and I can listen, understand, and judge to see that 80% of their programming may be intelligent and reasonable (we may disagree on 80%, but I get it). That being said, Fox news knows very well that a large portion of their viewership will not be discerning, and will take 100% of what they say as informed facts, and then run with it.