Yes you've got 2 of Comey's 3 statements on the issue that fall out to Hillary's favor. And you have distrust of Comey's intentions on both sides. Also:
......
Trump has Rudy Guliani telling him that the Foundation pay-for-play is a simple conviction -- even the % of CF donors who got face time with our Sec of State is a matter of public record --
he has Sessions wanting to renew the FBI investigations starting Jan. 20,
he has Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter telling him that a President should allow the FBI to simply do its job without Presidential interference, and
he has much if not most of America polling that Hillary should be indicted.
Fair enough?
.....
So from TRUMP's point of view here are his options on investigations, from most hawkish to most dovish:
1) Guliani - run around publicly declaring an easy racketeering conviction
2) Sessions angle - declare a renewal the FBI investigations per much of America's desire
3) Stand aside, do nothing, and hand it off to Sessions as AG
4) State his intention to NOT prosecute
5) State his intention to NOT prosecute and do it very early, to put it behind us
6) State his intention to not prosecute, do it early ... and explain on Twitter it's "because she's a good person"
Given the range of options, yes, it looks to me like a gracious attitude on Trump's part.
And I agree there are MANY advantages to just declaring the e-mail and Clinton foundation problems to be in the rear view mirror. Washington started this Republic off right by not being vindictive about the Whiskey Rebels, and the attitude has been serving us well ever since.