Add new comment

1

From '12-'15, Dyson had BABIP vL of .265, .250, .333, .286...Last season he was Ruthian at .423.  Which means that an extra 3 bloops fell, or 3 seeing eye grounders scooted through, in his 26 AB's.  He was 11-26, rather than the 8-26 you might expect.

Bet the Under next year.

But vR, he's been pretty consistent.  (OBP/OPS)  '12=.340/.689  '13=.339/.741  '14=.326/.663  '15=.313/.715  '16=.330/.700

I think the .330/.700 he had last season is the Over/Under line.  A fair one, too.  His career #'s are .329 and .697.

Danny Valencia is .246-.288-.394=.682 for comparison.  But he's terrible vR.*

Actually, if you set Dyson's line at .330 and .700, it is a fair question whether his Over/Under is any better than Gamel's.

All in all:  Give me 4 years of Karns.

*  '15-'16 indicate he's found his vR medicine, however.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

shout_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.