1
You make the right case, but I can't imagine it, nor would I want it. In a vacuum, it makes sense, but with the current makeup of the squad and salary commitments, I'm looking for $$ in the rotation, not at our (arguably) deepest position going forward. Even if you want Dyson back, one could argue he can be had for two years at that price, not just one (or some such).
Unrelated: I'm still deflated over no Drew Smiley. What could have been....