Gosh Doc, reading this article was like holding a mirror up to the truth... it was mostly there, but perfectly backwards ;)
Of course I'm here to defend Richard Sherman. That goes without saying. He's my favorite athlete, and it's not even close. He's so unique that I imagine it will take quite a while before someone else matches his bizarre combination of talent, brash showmanship, underdog credibility, football IQ, non-football IQ, and underlying good heartedness. There's been a thousand stars who talked smack like Sherm does. There's been a hundred who backed it up as consistently as he does. There's been maybe ten who managed to do it without being massive jerks. There's only one that we get to see up close and personal, once weekly on the local team.
I don't think Sherm's welcome in Seattle is wearing thin. Far from it. The fans know who he is, and they love him for it. Moreover, the players love him. You notice all the stories about how emphatically he takes rookies under his wing, spends hours after practice with them showing them tricks of the trade? Richard is a lightning rod on the field and the podium, but he's a wonderful guy when no one is watching. As evidence, look at how his teammates stick with him in his most controversial moments. When he went off on Crabtree, they fed off of it and rode that energy to a SB blowout. When he blew up at Chris Richard, the defense restrained him. Then, when he'd calmed down, they rallied around him, not the coach. When he asked for a trade in the offseason, no one blinked. Everyone said it was a non-issue, except his de facto older brother Dougie. I've linked a great article below, but the money quote is this:
"Sherm might say something to Pete, to John [Schneider], to myself, to [Bevell] that on the outside, it may seem negative. But because of the chemistry that we have, because of the rapport and the relationships that we have within this team, it’s not necessarily taken as a personal threat or a personal comment.
"It’s taken as, ‘Hey, I’m competing. I just want you to know that I feel like we need to go in a different direction. We need to do something different.'"
And Sherm is usually right. They do need to do something different. The entire point of that 3...1 atricle was that the Hawks need to find It again, whatever It is. I used to refer to them as "the team of destiny," back in 2012-14. Miracles followed them everywhere. The Tip, the Pick Six against the Texans, Earl’s first karate chop, Beastquake II, the bombs to Kearse in to with both NFCCGs, his insane catch on the final drive of the second SB. More Wilson scrambles that I can count. They've been missing some of that magic the last couple years. Not that it's gone, just that you couldn't count on it anymore. I dunno for sure, but it sure seemed to be back against the Rams. We'll see. The more important point is, Sherm is only ever trying to guide the team back to that place, the zone they were in for all those years. And you can see it eating him alive when they can't find it. But he keeps trying, through coaxing and bombast and determination, to help the team find it again. They appreciate that, I'll guarantee it.
As for Russell and his granular aphorisms, I think you're misreading the author's intent. Whenever a reporter asked Russ, "How'd you engineer that game-winning drive," he answers, "Gosh Michelle, that's a great question. I'd just like to thank God for putting me in a position to succeed, and give credit to all my teammates for working their tails off. You just gotta beleive, and good things will happen to you. Go Hawks!" The problem isn't that he thanked God. As you point out, the NFL is chock full of deeply religious men. The problem is that he just said forty-three words, and didn't come close to giving an original, insightful, or verifiably honest thought. Russell treats the media like a politician does. He's been practicing giving meaningless interviews since he was 8. He'll bury you in positive platitudes, without ever saying a damned thing. That's why he seems so sandy.
Pete Carroll is the same way. He is ceaselessly, infuriatingly positive. My take on it is, and always has been, dichotomous. On the one hand, I agree wholeheartedly that the attitudes of Russ and Pete are a HUGE advantage. They're crazy, but a kind of crazy that is intentional and leads direrctly to massive sustained success and multiple championships. However, given years of exposure, I'm not at all surprised that a realist and cynic like Sherm has started to run out of patience for their "the sun'll come out tomorrow" schtick. It's a difference of styles that's unavoidable, and eventually may prove untenable. Remember, the Hawks weren't trying to trade Sherm: he requested a trade. But for as long as Pete, or Doug, or Earl and Kam can convince Sherm to put up with it, the better. Keeping the band together is their best shot at another title, and I hope Richard is willing to swallow his personal frustration and stick it out with this team. He's kept fighting like a lion each week, no matter discontented he feels off the field. I love him for that, as should we all.